(function() { (function(){function c(a){this.t={};this.tick=function(a,c,b){var d=void 0!=b?b:(new Date).getTime();this.t[a]=[d,c];if(void 0==b)try{window.console.timeStamp("CSI/"+a)}catch(l){}};this.tick("start",null,a)}var a;if(window.performance)var e=(a=window.performance.timing)&&a.responseStart;var h=0=b&&(window.jstiming.srt=e-b)}if(a){var d=window.jstiming.load;0=b&&(d.tick("_wtsrt",void 0,b),d.tick("wtsrt_","_wtsrt", e),d.tick("tbsd_","wtsrt_"))}try{a=null,window.chrome&&window.chrome.csi&&(a=Math.floor(window.chrome.csi().pageT),d&&0=c&&window.jstiming.load.tick("aft")};var f=!1;function g(){f||(f=!0,window.jstiming.load.tick("firstScrollTime"))}window.addEventListener?window.addEventListener("scroll",g,!1):window.attachEvent("onscroll",g); })();

Wednesday, January 31, 2007

Really? How about being excited that a candidate has all of the qualifications for the office they seek, rather than what their gender or skin color is?
Biden has much too big of a mouth to ever get the Dem nomination. He loves the sound of his own voice.

On a side note, the HuffPOS is apparently going to pretend that Biden never made his other comments (See below).
“I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy,” he said. “I mean, that’s a storybook, man.”

As opposed to the typical evil-looking, unintelligent, dirty, black male, Joe?

Nice one, Hair Club Man.
So, Obama is pretty well spoken for a black man, but don't take offense, some of Joes' best friends are black.
The 'well spoken' ones of course.

Now....what do you suppose the libtardos would be screaming right now if Hair-Plug Boy were a Republican?

Yup, you got it.
Dems are sooooooooo friggin' phony.

Labels: , , ,

Tuesday, January 30, 2007

In a recent poll, 34% of Democrats said that they DO NOT want the US military to succeed in Iraq. Why? Because they want to see Bush fail. They don't care about anything else. Not even the well being of their country.

That was a real nice peace march by the libtards this past week, wasn't it? They smashed and vandalized a Fox News van, sprayed anarchist symbols and filth on the steps of the Capitol, and spat on a disabled Iraq War vet.

A nice bunch of peace loving Americans, don't you think?

So? MANY scientists are skeptical of the global warming hype. They are the ones who are being intimidated. Scientists who decline to jump on the global warming wagon have been attacked, ostracized, and threatened by those who think differently.

The Left does not tolerate any dissent from their point of views.
Follow the money. Global Warming is a HUGE moneybucket for scientists that rely on grants and they arent about to give that up.

The majority of special interest groups that tout GWarming are anti-capitalist libtards intent on bringing the evil corporations down. That is their sole motivation.

John Kerry recently stated in Switzerland that the world is worse off because 'this president' walked away from Kyoto.
But dig a little deeper and you will find that Kerry himself voted against Kyoto.

"When we walk away from global warming, Kyoto, when we are irresponsibly slow in moving toward AIDS in Africa, when we don't advance and live up to our own rhetoric and standards, we set a terrible message of duplicity and hypocrisy," Kerry said.

The Byrd-Hagel Resolution in 1997 made it clear that the US would not allow itself to be bound by the treaty as long as it exempted India, China, and other developing nations. That's the same position as the Bush Administration has taken -- and the same position that John Kerry himself took in 1997 when he voted in favor of the Byrd-Hagel Resolution.

That's yet another example of the hypocrisy of John Kerry -- but there's more.

He took the time to scold the Bush administration for its lack of effort on AIDS and other diseases in Africa. However, Bush has already spent more on these issues than the last Democratic administration did in eight years. Humanitarian aid to Africa comprised $1.4 billion a year at the end of the Clinton administration, but Bush has tripled that to $4 billion per year -- and wants to more than double it over the next two years.


No shortage of hypocrisy from the Left.

Monday, January 29, 2007

A little tip for the mentally impaired over on the left side of the aisle; that's the job of the WH press secretary, he is supposed to put the administrations spin on news events of the day.

Are the readers and the staff over at the Huff-POS so stupid and naive as to believe that Democrats don't do the same thing when they are in office?

No shortage of hypocrisy.

Furthermore, Arie DID NOT, as the HuffPo headline so dishonestly states, admit to spinning the news. Read for yourself.


Saturday, January 27, 2007

If you ever had any doubts about what a Leftwing socialist piece of crap website the Huffington Post is, then this should help to ease those doubts.
People like Fonda and Chavez are heroes to the Left. Libtards would rather see us lose in the Middle East than win. They are cowards, appeasers, and socialist protomarxists.
The lovefest for Hanoi Jane continues with the HuffPo readers:

I'm sure the assholes will find fault with her.They always do. Good for her.
By: logc on January 27, 2007 at 06:01pm

It was a great protest to show our government what the last election was all about.
By: gotalife on January 27, 2007 at 06:05pm

It is unfortunate for me to report that Jane Fonda has been closer to a combat situation than Dubya or Cheney or anyone in this dreadful administration of warmongering chickenshit chickenhawks....they hate her because she is not a coward like all of them are.

By: kasinca on January 27, 2007 at 06:12pm

You go girl!! I've never held animosity towards you for your stance during Vietnam - right, wrong, or indifferent, you were doing all you could to stop the insanity. I thought your actions very patriotic.
By: TDB on January 27, 2007 at 06:16pm

I think, it is great that Jane Fonda marche in the peace march. And she was right in Vietnam too. No war is right. No war is justified. Nobody should have to die for that.
By: Ludwiga on January 27, 2007 at 06:23pm

Its good to have her back.
By: panthiest on January 27, 2007 at 06:27pm

Labels: , , , ,

Friday, January 26, 2007

Wednesday, January 24, 2007

Top 10 Surprises In Bush's State Of the Union Address

From the January 23 Late Show with David Letterman, the "Top Ten Surprises In George W. Bush's State of the Union Address." Late Show home page: www.cbs.com

10. Wore a "Hillary in 2008" T-shirt

9. Unveiled plan for botched invasion of Iran

8. Vowed to end America's dependence on foreign films

7. 20-minute presentation on why "The O.C." shouldn't be canceled

6. More than once, he turned and kissed Nancy Pelosi on the mouth

5. When he said "Times are tough. That's why when I need a little pick-me-up I reach for a Snickers!"

4. Concluded policy proposal with a rousing "Deal or No Deal?"

3. Announced intelligence reports suggest there is a veal shank under the pantsuit

2. For viewers who have HDTV, he was 17% Bushier

1. Showed up late explaining he was watching "Idol"

Why go with the actual quote when you can slant the news by making up the quote?
It's another HuffPo headline that bears little resemblance to the truth. Cheney said the premise of Wolf Blitzer's question was hogwash. He certainly did not say that criticism of him was hogwash.

Why can't the Left ever tell the truth?

BLITZER: Here's what Jim Webb, senator from Virginia said in the Democratic response last night -- he said, "The president took us into this war recklessly. We are now, as a nation, held hostage to the predictable and predicted disarray that has followed."

And it's not just Jim Webb; it's some of your good Republican friends in the Senate and the House are now seriously questioning your credibility, because of the blunders and the failures. Gordon Smith...

CHENEY: Wolf, Wolf, I simply don't accept the premise of your question. I just think it's hogwash.

Labels: , ,

Tuesday, January 23, 2007

It's not enough that the libtards think American foreign policy should be dictated by polls, they also believe that FOREIGN polls should play a part in our decision making process.

Sunday, January 21, 2007

Bad news for the Left: The Constitution still trumps MSM polls. The Dems think popular opinion or mob rule should determine our presidents actions now that they hold minimal control over both houses.
Sorry, moonbats.
Luckily for us, Washington, Lincoln, FDR, and Truman did not lead by popular opinion.

Thursday, January 18, 2007

Honestly, I don't think the Dems or the MSM would give Obama the time of day if he was white. And you know I am right.
Everybody seems eager to provide him a verbal blowjob, but I'm not aware of anything he's accomplished that merits such attention.
Here's a prediction: Americans will never elect to the Oval Office anybody named 'Obama'.
President Obama? Barack?
Nope, don't think so....

Doesn't matter what color they are, it ain't gonna happen.
Here's another prediction: no matter how far you think we've come, we're not going to elect a woman either. Sorry to burst your PC bubble, but that's reality. Aint gonna happen.

Not yet.

Wednesday, January 17, 2007

Jack Bauer To The Rescue

Is there anything the Left won't piss and moan about?
Keith Olbermann, clearly the most partisan hack on cable news, stated this week that the show, 24 is propaganda;

"Is 24 just entertainment or is it propaganda designed to keep people thinking about domestic terrorism to keep us scared?Gripping drama or thinly veiled propaganda? In case you missed the point, the show finished up with a nuclear weapon detonating in a major American city, literally conjuring up the administration's imagery for the war in Iraq, the good old mushroom cloud."

There is no doubt that Loony Olbermann has gone over the edge.
He shares the views of the World Socialist Website. Like Krazy Keith, they also claim that '24' is Bush administration propaganda and that the producers of the show are trying to profit from the war on terror. The tards over at the socialist website also claim that the, "systematic presentation of torture is intended to inure the population and convey the message that this barbaric treatment is somehow acceptable in the “global war on terror.”

It's hard not to laugh.

Fuck 'em up, Jack.

Tuesday, January 16, 2007

It's not like many of us conservatives think McCain is worth a damn either. He tries to play both sides of the fence at the expense of the country.

That being said, the left ADORED him when he rolled over for them. Now that he disagrees with them he is the bad guy again.

What strikes as humorous about this HuffPo headline is that McCain is labled as 'trying to be a radical right candidate' simply for trying to establish a line of dialogue with Falwell.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but aren't the libtardos the ones who are always screaming for dialogue with the enemy?

So, it stands to reason that Democrats Are Trying To Be America Hating Radicals By Wanting To Establish Dialogue With The Enemy.

Can't have it both ways, moonbats.
Though you do try.....you do try

Libtards Reaching Across The Aisle Again

The HuffPo is really proud of this guy. His quote says it all. It's the Dems philosophy:
NOTHING this president can say or do would alter their prejudices against him. The headline should have read, "THIS IS THE KIND OF JUROR WHO LYNCHES PEOPLE IF GIVEN THE CHANCE".

The President could end the war tomorrow, do exactly as the libtards demand, and they would still hate him.
He could cure cancer and AIDS, eliminate world povertry, singlehandedly stop global warming, make the muslims love us, and the moonbats would STILL hate him.

And they proudly admit it.

Oh, and here comes another glorious scandal that will go nowhere. Thank the Wilsons for wasting our taxpayer dollars with their egregious attention whore antics.