(function() { (function(){function c(a){this.t={};this.tick=function(a,c,b){var d=void 0!=b?b:(new Date).getTime();this.t[a]=[d,c];if(void 0==b)try{window.console.timeStamp("CSI/"+a)}catch(l){}};this.tick("start",null,a)}var a;if(window.performance)var e=(a=window.performance.timing)&&a.responseStart;var h=0=b&&(window.jstiming.srt=e-b)}if(a){var d=window.jstiming.load;0=b&&(d.tick("_wtsrt",void 0,b),d.tick("wtsrt_","_wtsrt", e),d.tick("tbsd_","wtsrt_"))}try{a=null,window.chrome&&window.chrome.csi&&(a=Math.floor(window.chrome.csi().pageT),d&&0=c&&window.jstiming.load.tick("aft")};var f=!1;function g(){f||(f=!0,window.jstiming.load.tick("firstScrollTime"))}window.addEventListener?window.addEventListener("scroll",g,!1):window.attachEvent("onscroll",g); })();

Sunday, September 24, 2006

Slick Willie's Meltdown on Fox

This is priceless. Half way through the interview Clinton gets royally pissed off and launches into a "this interview is a right wing hit job" rant.

You see, the Clinton's prefer interview settings where only softball questions are lobbed and the environment and questions are controlled.
He really loses it. I've never seen Slick Willie this pissed off before.

The truth hurts.


Blogger Bedazzzled1 said...

Hahaha! What's good for the goose...

BlogMad hit!

2:59 PM  
Blogger kickedKerrysAss said...

Watching the Rapist'n Chief on my big screen TV was even more telling than the video streams on the net. His nose looked like it was going to pop it was so red. I know it's a petty thing but what is with his dentures and that whistling and clicking??? LOL

The entire episode was one long “look at me” tantrum. Gad , Clinton can't you just disappear? You don’t make this country’s policy any more nor does your failing party, go home, bake cookies, do some chores… just leave the running of this country to the people we elected to do it. Jeeeze…

8:49 AM  
Blogger joe said...

The funny thing is everything clinton said was accurate in regards to the facts, despite wallace's discision to ask a misleading question baited with right wing talking points.

I agree, his getting mad didnt help him any, but even mad he ran through a comprehensive answer to each of the points wallace raised.

One can only dream of such honesty and ability to form complete sentences coming from the bush administration.

1:45 PM  
Blogger Senor said...

No, Joe. Everything Clinton said was bullshit. His primary source for his comments was Clarkes book.

Wallace was asking questions that were raised in the 911 Commission report.

Isnt it funny that liberals cry that they are persecuted for questioning this administration, and then when somebody asks a legitimate question of their ilk, they go completely moonbat.

5:07 PM  
Blogger joe said...

you're pathetic, point out one single lie. notice Clinton gave solid facts and a means for you to easily access them. Rice's rebuttal the next day was completely hollow and baseless, "we did as much as clinton did", while the 9-11 commission report says exactly the opposite.

You're the one claiming lies, point one out.

2:19 AM  
Blogger joe said...

These documents show Rices comments yesterday to be completely false:
memo from clarke to rice (application/pdf Object)

Strategy for Eliminating the Threat from the Jihadist Networks of al-Qida: Status and Prospects (application/pdf Object)

so, any luck on proving Clinton's lies?

2:38 AM  
Blogger joe said...

I suppose so long as I'm at it I should put this in a nice package, but Think Progress did it for me.

Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice yesterday accused Bill Clinton of making “flatly false” claims that the Bush administration didn’t lift a finger to stop terrorism before the 9/11 attacks.

… “What we did in the eight months was at least as aggressive as what the Clinton administration did in the preceding years,” Rice added.

The 9/11 Commission Report contradicts Rice’s claims. On December 4, 1998, for example, the Clinton administration received a President’s Daily Brief entitled “Bin Ladin Preparing to Hijack US Aircraft and Other Attacks.” Here’s how the Clinton administration reacted, according to the 9/11 Commission report:

The same day, [Counterterrorism Czar Richard] Clarke convened a meeting of his CSG [Counterterrorism Security Group] to discuss both the hijacking concern and the antiaircraft missile threat. To address the hijacking warning, the group agreed that New York airports should go to maximum security starting that weekend. They agreed to boost security at other East coast airports. The CIA agreed to distribute versions of the report to the FBI and FAA to pass to the New York Police Department and the airlines. The FAA issued a security directive on December 8, with specific requirements for more intensive air carrier screening of passengers and more oversight of the screening process, at all three New York area airports. [pg. 128-30]

On August 6, 2001, the Bush administration received a President’s Daily Brief entitled “Bin Laden Determined to Strike U.S.” Here’s how the Bush administration reacted, according to the 9/11 Commission report:

[President Bush] did not recall discussing the August 6 report with the Attorney General or whether Rice had done so.[p. 260]

We have found no indication of any further discussion before September 11 among the President and his top advisers of the possibility of a threat of an al Qaeda attack in the United States. DCI Tenet visited President Bush in Crawford, Texas, on August 17 and participated in the PDB briefings of the President between August 31 (after the President had returned to Washington) and September 10. But Tenet does not recall any discussions with the President of the domestic threat during this period. [p. 262]

Rice acknowledged that the 9/11 Commission report is the authoratative source on this debate: “I think this is not a very fruitful discussion. We’ve been through it. The 9/11 commission has turned over every rock and we know exactly what they said.”

3:10 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home